Solenoid valve reliability in lower energy operations

If a valve doesn’t function, your process doesn’t run, and that’s money down the drain. Or worse, a spurious trip shuts the process down. Or worst of all, a valve malfunction leads to a dangerous failure. Solenoid valves in oil and gasoline purposes management the actuators that transfer massive process valves, together with in emergency shutdown (ESD) systems. The solenoid needs to exhaust air to allow the ESD valve to return to fail-safe mode each time sensors detect a harmful process state of affairs. These valves must be quick-acting, sturdy and, above all, reliable to prevent downtime and the associated losses that happen when a process isn’t running.
And this is much more essential for oil and fuel operations where there’s restricted power out there, similar to remote wellheads or satellite tv for pc offshore platforms. Here, solenoids face a double reliability problem. First, a failure to operate correctly can not solely cause costly downtime, but a upkeep call to a distant location additionally takes longer and costs greater than a local restore. Second, to scale back the demand for power, many valve producers resort to compromises that really cut back reliability. This is dangerous enough for course of valves, however for emergency shutoff valves and other security instrumented methods (SIS), it is unacceptable.
Poppet valves are generally higher suited than spool valves for remote locations as a result of they’re less complicated. For low-power applications, look for a solenoid valve with an FFR of 10 and a design that isolates the media from the coil. (Courtesy of Norgren Inc.)
Choosing a dependable low-power solenoid
Many factors can hinder the reliability and efficiency of a solenoid valve. Friction, media move, sticking of the spool, magnetic forces, remanence of electrical present and materials characteristics are all forces solenoid valve manufacturers have to beat to construct probably the most dependable valve.
High spring drive is essential to offsetting these forces and the friction they trigger. However, in low-power purposes, most producers have to compromise spring drive to permit the valve to shift with minimal power. The reduction in spring drive leads to a force-to-friction ratio (FFR) as low as 6, though the generally accepted safety degree is an FFR of 10.
Several components of valve design play into the amount of friction generated. Optimizing every of these allows a valve to have greater spring drive whereas still sustaining a excessive FFR.
For example, the valve operates by electromagnetism — a current stimulates the valve to open, permitting the media to flow to the actuator and transfer the process valve. This media may be air, but it could even be pure gasoline, instrument gas or even liquid. This is particularly true in remote operations that should use no matter media is on the market. This means there is a trade-off between magnetism and corrosion. Valves during which the media comes in contact with the coil should be made from anticorrosive supplies, which have poor magnetic properties. A valve design that isolates the media from the coil — a dry armature — permits using highly magnetized materials. As a result, there isn’t a residual magnetism after the coil is de-energized, which in turn allows quicker response instances. This design additionally protects reliability by preventing contaminants in the media from reaching the internal workings of the valve.
Another factor is the valve housing design. Usually a heavy (high-force) spring requires a high-power coil to beat the spring power. Integrating pressure gauge หน้าปัด 2 นิ้ว and coil right into a single housing improves efficiency by stopping vitality loss, allowing for the use of a low-power coil, resulting in much less power consumption with out diminishing FFR. This integrated coil and housing design additionally reduces warmth, preventing spurious trips or coil burnouts. A dense, thermally environment friendly (low-heat generating) coil in a housing that acts as a warmth sink, designed with no air hole to entice heat around the coil, virtually eliminates coil burnout concerns and protects process availability and security.
Poppet valves are typically better suited than spool valves for remote operations. The reduced complexity of poppet valves increases reliability by lowering sticking or friction points, and reduces the variety of parts that may fail. Spool valves often have giant dynamic seals and many require lubricating grease. Over time, particularly if the valves aren’t cycled, the seals stick and the grease hardens, leading to larger friction that should be overcome. There have been reports of valve failure as a end result of moisture within the instrument media, which thickens the grease.
A direct-acting valve is your greatest option wherever potential in low-power environments. Not only is the design much less advanced than an indirect-acting piloted valve, but also pilot mechanisms often have vent ports that can admit moisture and contamination, leading to corrosion and allowing the valve to stay in the open place even when de-energized. Also, direct-acting solenoids are particularly designed to shift the valves with zero minimum stress requirements.
Note that some bigger actuators require high circulate rates and so a pilot operation is necessary. In this case, it is necessary to verify that all parts are rated to the same reliability ranking because the solenoid.
Finally, since most remote areas are by definition harsh environments, a solenoid put in there will must have strong construction and have the flexibility to withstand and operate at excessive temperatures while nonetheless sustaining the same reliability and security capabilities required in much less harsh environments.
When deciding on a solenoid management valve for a remote operation, it’s potential to discover a valve that does not compromise efficiency and reliability to scale back energy demands. Look for a excessive FFR, simple dry armature design, nice magnetic and heat conductivity properties and robust building.
Andrew Barko is the gross sales engineer for the Energy Sector of IMI Precision Engineering, makers of IMI Norgren, IMI Maxseal and IMI Herion brand components for power operations. He offers cross-functional expertise in software engineering and enterprise development to the oil, fuel, petrochemical and energy industries and is certified as a pneumatic Specialist by the International Fluid Power Society (IFPS).
Collin Skufca is the key account manager for the Energy Sector for IMI Precision Engineering. He offers experience in new business growth and buyer relationship management to the oil, fuel, petrochemical and power industries and is certified as a pneumatic specialist by the International Fluid Power Society (IFPS).

Scroll to Top